- 2026
- Corporate website
Perfect Group is a leading real estate development company in Ukraine
![]()
A website UX audit checks how easy it is for a visitor to understand what you offer, find what they need and send an enquiry or buy. It’s done when the visitors are there but the enquiries aren’t: the ads work, traffic comes in, but people disappear somewhere between the first screen and the form.
Below: what a UX audit checks, how it’s done and with which tools, what the report should contain, and a 20-point checklist you can use to check your own site in an hour.
UX (user experience) is a person’s experience on your site: whether it’s clear where to click, whether they find the answer quickly, whether anything gets in the way of the enquiry. A UX audit looks for the places where that path breaks and explains how to fix them.
Similar terms are often used alongside it:
| Name | Focus |
| Usability audit | Ease of use of the interface: navigation, forms, buttons, readability |
| UX audit | Broader: the whole customer journey from the first screen to the enquiry, including content and trust |
| UI audit | The visual side: whether the design is consistent, whether the main thing stands out, whether everything is readable |
| CRO audit | Conversion in numbers: where exactly people drop out of the funnel and what will bring the biggest gain in enquiries |
In practice a good audit combines all of these. The name matters less than the result: a list of specific problems with priorities and solutions.
If there are no enquiries at all, check the technical side first: are form submissions actually arriving? Sometimes the problem isn’t UX but emails landing in spam. How to set this up reliably is in our article on website CRM integration.
First agree on what counts as success: an enquiry, a call, a purchase, a catalogue download. And who your customers are, where they come from, what matters to them. Without this, the audit turns into a list of personal tastes.
In Google Analytics, look at which pages people enter and leave on, where the funnel breaks, how behaviour differs between phone and desktop, and which sources bring the people who do send enquiries. In Search Console, look at which queries bring people to the site and whether the page matches what they were looking for.
Heatmaps show where people click and how far they scroll. Session recordings show how individual people move through the site: where they pause, what they look for, where they abandon the form. There are services with a free plan for this, such as Microsoft Clarity. A few dozen watched recordings often tell you more than weeks of arguing about design.
The site is checked against well-known usability principles. The best known are Jakob Nielsen’s 10 usability heuristics: does the person see what’s going on, does the site speak their language, is it easy to fix a mistake, is the interface consistent. The expert goes through the key scenarios (“find a service and send an enquiry”, “compare plans”, “find the contacts”) and records what gets in the way.
The most convincing method is to give a few real people a task on your site and watch in silence. You don’t need dozens of participants: according to Nielsen Norman Group research, five participants find about 85% of usability problems. Several small tests after each change are better than one big one.
You don’t need a lab for your first test. You need five people similar to your customers (not colleagues who know the site) and an hour for each.
It’s best to test on a phone: that way you’ll see the site through the eyes of most of your customers.
| Tool | What it shows |
| Google Analytics 4 | Funnels, conversions, behaviour by device and source |
| Google Search Console | Which queries bring people to which pages |
| Microsoft Clarity, Hotjar | Heatmaps, session recordings, “rage clicks” on elements that don’t work |
| PageSpeed Insights | Page speed and stability on mobile |
| A conversation with your sales team | Which questions customers ask most often, what they couldn’t find on the site |
The last item is the most underrated. Your sales team hears every day what people find confusing, and that’s a free source of ideas for the audit.
A big slogan like “Driving your business forward” and a photo of a handshake. The visitor can’t tell whether they’re in the right place and leaves. The first screen should answer three questions: what you do, for whom, and what to do next.
Ten required fields, a CAPTCHA, a cryptic error after submission. Every field is another reason to put the enquiry off. How much form length matters is clear from online stores: according to the Baymard Institute, shoppers abandon about 70% of carts on average, and 17% do so precisely because checkout is too long or complicated. Meanwhile an optimal checkout fits into 7–8 fields. For a service enquiry, a name, a phone number and, if needed, one question about the task are usually enough. More on forms, messengers and calls in our article on website CRM integration.
A phone number only on the Contact page, no address, no case studies, no reviews, no faces of the team. For high-ticket services and B2B this is critical: people are looking for proof that the company is real and has done similar work before.
Sections are named the way the company refers to them internally, or follow its internal department structure. The customer is looking for their problem, not your org chart.
Tiny text, buttons that are hard to hit, tables that spill off the screen, a form hidden by the keyboard. How to check your mobile version in 15 minutes is in our article on responsive design.
In a store, the catalogue, product page and checkout are added to the general items, and that’s where most money is lost. According to the Baymard Institute (a survey of US shoppers, excluding those who were “just browsing”), the most common reasons for abandoning a cart are:
| Reason | Share of shoppers | What to check on the site |
| Unexpectedly high extra costs: shipping, fees | 40% | Is the shipping cost visible on the product page or in the cart? |
| Delivery too slow | 20% | Are delivery times shown before checkout? |
| Didn’t trust the site with card details | 19% | Familiar payment methods, contacts, reviews, a tidy-looking checkout |
| Site required creating an account | 18% | Can people buy without registering? |
| Checkout too long or complicated | 17% | The number of fields and steps, clear error messages |
Check the catalogue separately: do filters work on a phone, is it clear how many products were found, do selected filters survive going into a product page and back? More in our article on cart abandonment.
Go through it on a phone, since that’s how most of your customers see the site. Every “no” is a candidate for fixing.
First screen
Navigation
Service and product pages
Forms
Mobile version and speed
Trust
Partly, yes. The checklist above, free heatmaps and session recordings and a five-person test will find most of the obvious problems. That’s enough to fix the basics: hidden contacts, a long form, a confusing first screen. Which behavioural principles are worth testing on a website and which are myths is covered in our article on neuromarketing on websites.
The limitation of a self-audit is your own blind spot. You know your site and your product, so you don’t notice what’s unclear to a newcomer. An outside view helps when:
In scope, an expert audit of a small site usually takes from a few days to two weeks. With user testing and analysis of several weeks of behavioural data, longer.
A good report isn’t a presentation with general advice but a working list. For each problem:
A report without priorities is hard to use: nobody will fix fifty items of equal weight.
A website isn’t a one-off project. Even after a good audit, it’s worth going through the checklist above every few months and looking at your analytics: customer behaviour changes, and the site should change with it.
Our thoughts on business, marketing,
design, and website development.
Available for new challenges
Fill out the form